Parakala.org : Sri Konda Laxman Bapuji’s Sadbhavana  Meet on Sunday, 20th November went off peacefully in Nellore. He was  able to put forth his views on the division of the state without any  disturbance. He not only argued for the need to create a separate  Telangana State, but also said that the state should be divided into  three. He batted for separate Rayalaseema also. He said he was in favour  of smaller states, no matter how many.
Speakers in the meet expressed their views unhindered. Nobody barged  into the meet. Nobody shouted slogans outside the venue. Nobody hurled  abuses. Nobody tried to manhandle anybody.
Some prominent leaders who are for Visalandhra went to the venue, met  Bapuji and other speakers. They greeted him, conveyed their respects to  him, felicitated him with a shawl and left the venue.
Some of the speeches at the meet were less than dignified, if you go  by the newspaper reports. 
Uncharacteristically, even Bapuji crossed his  familiar line of argument. He said that only capitalists opposed the  division of the state. Never mind. That’s what he wanted to say, and he  said it. It was his wisdom. So be it.
The group that invited Bapuji and his companions is a pretty smallish  one. It’s presence in Nellore is insignificant. The organisers were  unfamiliar to the public life of Nellore. The strong and powerful  players in the political and social scene of Nellore are strong  integrationists. There were integrationists even during the 1972 Jai  Andhra agitation. It is well known that during that phase Nellore was a  hot bed of separatism. 
Separatism, however, is a very faint voice in  Nellore now.
Notwithstanding the strong integrationist opinion, notwithstanding  the anonymity of the organisers of the separatist meet, Bapuji’s meet  went off peacefully.
What does this indicate?
It clearly shows that Visalandhra Vaadana is self-confident and  secure. It is not afraid of anyone organising a meet to propagate a  contrary view. It’s self-confidence is revealed by the fact that staunch  integrationists met the visitors and showed their respect. It indicates  that the integrationists are not against separatists as individuals but  are only against separatism as an idea. They only disagree with the  separatists on their vision of the future of Andhra Pradesh.  Integrationists have shown that one can disagree without being  disrespectful and undemocratic or disruptive.
Voices of integration are not loud and shrill. They are dignified. But they are clear.
Voices of separatism are loud, shrill, abusive and disruptive. They are a cacophony.
Nellore meet brought out this contrast into bold relief. The meet  revealed the petty mindedness of separatists everywhere – in the Coastal  area, in Rayalaseema and in the Telangana.
If Bapuji’s mission is Sadbhavana as he claims it is, it would have  earned him respect if he had invited an integrationist to speak at his  meeting. If he had given a public commitment that he would take an  integrationist along with him and provide a platform for airing the  argument, Bapuji would have lived up to the expectations of people who  value spirit of tolerance in public life.
Has separatist pettiness polluted Bapuji’s Sadbhavana too?
Good to note that Bapuji had better luck than R. Narayanamurthy, Botsa Satyanarayana, Y. Koteshwara Rao, Venkaiah Naidu and other Jai Andhra leaders.
రిప్లయితొలగించండి